22 Nov

Four-Level Thinking: Rethinking Chinese and Western Medicine

by In: about acupuncture - 0 Comment

Preface to Four-Level Thinking: Rethinking Chinese and Western Medicine

— How Four-Level Thinking Gives Chinese and Western Medicine a Shared Language for the First Time

For many years, “Chinese medicine versus Western medicine” has been an endless debate.
Some insist that Chinese medicine is true holistic medicine;
others believe that Western medicine is the only real science.
Some people worship machines and data,
while others place their trust in meridians and qi–blood.

The more heated the debate becomes,
the simpler the conclusions tend to be.
The richer the information,
the poorer the understanding.

Why?

Because we have been trying to compare two medical systems that operate on different levels of understanding,
while forcing them onto the same flat plane.

The issue is not whether Chinese medicine is “better” or Western medicine is “better”,
but that they look at the human body from different cognitive levels.

I. Why Do Debates Between Chinese and Western Medicine Never End?

Because we are trying to compare two multi-dimensional systems
with a single, linear way of thinking.

Western medicine starts from points:
tissues, organs, lab values, anatomical structures, lesions.

Chinese medicine starts from fields:
qi, shen (spirit), meridians, constitution, rhythms.

They are not looking at the same picture.

So most arguments are essentially asking:

“Which is better – the microscope or the satellite image?”

The microscope gives you clarity, but over a very small area.
The satellite image gives you the whole landscape, but with fewer details.

The real question is not which one to choose,
but what each of them is actually able to see.

To make this debate meaningful,
we need a higher-level coordinate system.

II. Four-Level Thinking: Re-understanding the Human Body Through Point, Line, Plane and Spirit

After more than forty years of clinical practice
— spanning Western medicine, Chinese medicine, structural medicine, and neurological diagnostics —
I gradually realized one thing:

The human body cannot be understood from a single level.

Out of this realization came a simple yet powerful framework:

Point → Line → Plane → Spirit

Level One: Point
We look at the local, the structural, the lesion, the lab value.
This is where modern Western medicine is strongest:
emergency care, surgery, infection control, intensive care.

Level Two: Line
We look at connections and directions between points:
neural pathways, tension lines, meridian routes, chains of symptoms and causality.
This is the core of traditional medicine, modern pain medicine, and functional medicine.

Level Three: Plane
We look at the whole system and network:
overall posture, tension fields, the global circulation of qi and blood,
the autonomic nervous system,
and the interaction between sleep, metabolism and emotion.
This is key to understanding chronic illness, functional disorders, and constitutional patterns.

Level Four: Spirit (Field)
We look at the integration of life:
emotion, will, self-healing capacity, biological rhythms, central integration,
and how the “life field” governs the entire body.

These four levels are not mysticism.
They are different tiers of cognition.
This is the framework I distilled after many years of observing and treating real human bodies.

III. How Four-Level Thinking Gives Chinese and Western Medicine a Shared Language

Once we use this four-level framework to examine the two medical systems,
things suddenly become clearer:

Western medicine is strongest at:
Level One (Point) and part of Level Two (Line).

It is precise, measurable, verifiable, operable, and controllable.
It is highly effective for clear lesions, structural damage, acute and critical conditions.

Chinese medicine is strongest at:
Level Two (Line), Level Three (Plane), and Level Four (Spirit).

It focuses on overall patterns, trends and directions,
on systems, life fields, rhythms and constitution.
It can explain why problems recur,
why they spread,
why they become widespread or systemic,
and why “one place hurts but the origin is somewhere else” —
precisely where Western medicine is relatively weak.

Each system has its strengths and its limitations.
Because they stand on different levels,
they are in fact complementary rather than mutually exclusive.

Four-level thinking is not designed to “reconcile” the two sides,
but to show that:

Many of the arguments were never on the same level to begin with.

When we stand on the ground of four-level thinking,
the differences between Chinese and Western medicine are no longer a binary opposition,
but a multi-layered panorama in which the two systems
reveal and complete each other.

IV. Why Am I Writing This Series?

Because I have seen too many people trapped between systems:

  • They undergo countless tests, yet no cause is found.

  • They take many medications, yet the problem does not resolve.

  • They follow one theoretical model of treatment,
    but never consider the entire functional pathway behind it.

  • They fixate on a single point,
    while neglecting the whole plane of interaction.

  • They are caught in debates,
    yet never truly understand the foundations of either medical system.

I hope to use the simplest possible framework
to help ordinary people — and even doctors —
re-understand both Chinese medicine and modern Western medicine.

To see their validity,
and also to see their boundaries.

This is popular science,
but it is also a systematic整理 of medical thinking —
and perhaps the groundwork for a future book.

V. This Will Be a Series, and Also a Doorway

Starting from this preface,
I will write step by step from several angles:

  • Understanding the human body through four-level thinking

  • Understanding diagnosis through four-level thinking

  • Comparing treatment logic through four-level thinking

  • Looking at chronic illness, pain, and functional medicine through four-level thinking

  • Looking at emotion, sleep, and the nervous system through four-level thinking

  • Understanding constitution, rhythms, and the life field through four-level thinking

  • Why, in the end, modern and traditional medicine must converge at the “Spirit level”

This project is both popular science and theoretical construction.
It speaks to the general public,
but also to the doctors of the future.

This is the starting point of the series.

My hope is that, by walking this path,
we can move the conversation between Chinese and Western medicine:

  • from argument → to understanding

  • from mutual exclusion → to mutual complementarity

  • from fragmentation → to genuine integration

In the end, medicine is not a forced choice between two camps.
In the end, medicine is about seeing the larger picture.

Chapter One · Four-Level Thinking: The Foundational Language for Understanding the Human Body

(English Translation)

The human body is complex.
No single layer of understanding can fully explain it.
Any medical system that relies on only one perspective will inevitably encounter blind spots.

Four-Level Thinking divides all human phenomena into four cognitive layers:

Point — structure and locality
Line — connection and direction
Plane — system and global pattern
Spirit — integration and vital intention

This is a self-consistent framework with no overlap and no gaps.
It does not create a new form of medicine—it simply places each medical system back into its proper cognitive level.

I. Level One: Point — The Layer of Structural Units

Definition
A Point is the smallest observable unit of the human body—structural, local, and material.

Points include:

  • Organs, anatomical regions, nerves, muscles, tendons

  • Lesions visible on imaging (herniations, tears, degenerations)

  • Laboratory markers (glucose, CRP, hormones, etc.)

  • Any unit that can be measured, quantified, or precisely located

Nature of Point:
Static, local, divisible—the material reality of the body.

What Points can explain:

  • Trauma, tears, fractures

  • Infections, tumors

  • Organ failure

  • Abnormal blood or biochemical markers

  • Acute diseases and critical conditions

What Points cannot explain:

  • Referred pain (belongs to Line)

  • Postural problems (belongs to Plane)

  • Emotion-induced pain (belongs to Spirit)

  • Functional disorders with normal structure (Line/Plane)

A Point can explain local facts,
but cannot explain global relationships.

II. Level Two: Line — The Layer of Connection and Dynamics

Definition
A Line is the dynamic relationship between Points—its direction, pathway, and causal chain.
It asks: “From where to where? And why does one part influence another?”

Lines include:

  • Neural pathways

  • Tension-transmission pathways

  • Muscle synergy pathways

  • Force lines (e.g., ground reaction → pelvis → spine)

  • Meridian directional pathways

  • Qi movement (ascending/descending)

  • Symptom chains (numbness → weakness; bloating → back pain)

Nature of Line:
Dynamic, causal, directional — a mechanistic explanation.

What Lines can explain:

  • Why foot pain originates from the lumbar spine

  • Why shoulder pain originates from the neck

  • Why stress affects digestion

  • Why pain radiates or “pulls” to another area

  • How functional disorders flare or subside

What Lines cannot explain:

  • Multi-system interactions (Plane)

  • Autonomic nervous system integration (Spirit)

  • Constitution and biological rhythms (Plane/Spirit)

Lines explain relationships,
not the whole system.

III. Level Three: Plane — The Layer of Systems and Global Patterns

Definition
A Plane consists of many Lines woven together into a unified operating system.
It examines systemic behavior, not local behavior.

Planes include:

  • Global posture (upper/lower crossed syndrome, pelvic tilt)

  • Integrated muscle–fascia–skeletal system

  • Autonomic nervous system (sympathetic/parasympathetic patterns)

  • Overall visceral functional patterns

  • The meridian network system

  • Interactions among emotion, metabolism, and sleep

  • Constitution and life rhythms

Nature of Plane:
Systemic, holistic, network-based, field-like.

What Planes can explain:

  • Why prolonged sitting causes multi-site pain

  • Why low back pain and leg pain often coexist

  • Why “poor digestion → poor sleep → palpitations → neck tension”

  • Why posture affects visceral function

What Planes cannot explain:

  • Will, intention, vital direction (Spirit)

  • Deep psychological trauma (Spirit)

Planes explain system-level patterns,
but not life-level integration.

IV. Level Four: Spirit — The Layer of Life Integration

Definition
Spirit is the highest integrative capacity of a living organism—
governing emotion, consciousness, will, self-healing, and adaptive capacity.

This is not a religious concept.
It is the medical concept of the body’s Central Integrator.

Spirit includes:

  • Autonomic nervous integration (sympathetic/parasympathetic balance)

  • The brain’s interpretation of pain

  • Emotional and behavioral patterns

  • Will and purposefulness

  • Sleep rhythms

  • Recovery capacity

  • The sense of vitality

Nature of Spirit:
The central governing system of life—
determining how a person lives, reacts, recovers, and experiences pain.

What Spirit can explain:

  • Why stress leads to full-body pain

  • Why chronic illnesses can persist for ten years

  • Why some people are prone to anxiety and pain amplification

  • Why “poor sleep → poor mood → poor physical function”

  • Why some patients worsen despite treatment

What Spirit cannot explain:

  • Definite structural lesions (Point)

  • Confirmed anatomical damage (Point)

Spirit explains how life operates itself,
the core of the four levels.

Summary of This Chapter

Point is static.
Line is dynamic.
Plane is systemic.
Spirit is integrative.

The four levels do not conflict, do not overlap, and leave no blind spot.
Together they form the simplest and most stable language
for understanding every phenomenon of the human body.

Chapter Two · The Tensional System: The Common Foundation of Structure and Function

(English Translation)

Over the past decades, the concept of the myofascial chain has become extremely popular—especially in structural medicine, physiotherapy, and sports rehabilitation. It has been widely used to explain posture, pain, and movement patterns.

However, when placed within the framework of Four-Level Thinking, two major problems immediately appear:

  1. It is too linear and cannot reflect the truly holistic, field-like nature of human tension.

  2. The word “chain (line)” easily conflicts with the second level of this book—Line (connection and direction).

Therefore, in this book, I will no longer use the term “myofascial chain.”
Instead, I adopt a more scientific, systematic, and Four-Level-compatible concept:

The Tensional System

It represents the modern medical understanding of the deep coupling between structure, biomechanics, posture, and the nervous system.
It is one of the most important ways Western medicine contributes to understanding the human body as an integrated whole.

2.1 Concept of the Tensional System

The tensional system refers to:

A continuous, body-wide network formed by fascia, muscles, tendons, ligaments, neural tension, visceral suspensory structures, and pressure systems of the body cavities.

This network can pull or anchor, transmit force or regulate nerve function,
influence structure or modulate function.

It is the body’s:

  • Structural framework

  • Mechanical distribution system

  • Postural maintenance system

  • Movement coordination system

  • Foundation of pain and compensation

  • Channel through which emotions affect the body

Simply put:
The tensional system is one of the most important—and most overlooked—systems of the human body.

2.2 Components of the Tensional System

The tensional system spans the entire body and is composed of multiple layers:

1) Fascia

Envelops, connects, and separates all structures.
It is the main carrier of tension and has continuity, plasticity, and extensibility.

2) Muscles and Myofascia

Muscle contraction and relaxation alter local tension and transmit force through fascia—
the main source of dynamic tension.

3) Tendons and Ligaments

Anchor tension and muscle force to bones or structural nodes—
the “hooks” that direct tensional pathways.

4) Neural Tension

Nerves possess tension properties as well.
Stretch, compression, or irritation can alter pain patterns and motor control.
Examples:
Sciatic nerve tension → unstable gait
Cervical nerve tension → hand numbness

5) Bone Anchor Points

Bony prominences (tuberosities, spines, ridges) act as key attachment and redirection points for tension.

6) Visceral Suspensory System

Ligaments and mesenteries that suspend organs:
Tension in these structures greatly affects the musculoskeletal system.
Examples:
Tight stomach → back pain
Tight diaphragm → neck/shoulder strain
Pelvic organ tension → lumbosacral discomfort

7) Pressure Systems of the Body Cavities

Thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic pressures shape the overall tensional pattern.
The true “core system” consists of:

  • Diaphragm

  • Pelvic floor

  • Transversus abdominis

  • Multifidus

Together, these form a continuous, integrated tension-regulating mechanism.

These elements collectively form a continuous, unified tensional network
that supports human posture, movement, and adaptability.

2.3 Primary Tensional Directions: From “Chains” to a Tensional Field

Although the tensional system is one integrated network, tension in space is not evenly distributed.
Through millions of years of evolution, the human body developed several Primary Tensional Directions that determine:

  • Posture

  • Movement chains

  • Pain distribution

  • Compensation patterns

Traditional structural medicine refers to these as “deep front line,” “superficial front line,” “superficial back line,” and “lateral line.”

To avoid confusion with Level Two (“Line”), I redefine them as:

Primary Tensional Directions

  1. Deep Tensional Axis

  2. Anterior Tensional Surface

  3. Posterior Tensional Surface

  4. Lateral Tensional Surface

These four directions form the main framework of the tensional system.

2.3.1 Deep Tensional Axis — The Core Stability Mast

Corresponds to the traditional Deep Front Line,
but this book emphasizes the axis, not a line.

Includes:

  • Diaphragm

  • Psoas and iliacus

  • Transversus abdominis, multifidus

  • Pelvic floor

  • Deep spinal muscles

  • Mesenteric and visceral suspensory structures

Functions:

  • Maintain internal stability

  • Regulate breathing efficiency

  • Establish the “central axis” of posture

  • Influence visceral function

  • Determine whether the body can truly “stand tall” or “flex naturally”

Clinical significance:

  • Excessive deep tension → sympathetic dominance → insomnia, anxiety, stiff neck and shoulders

  • Insufficient deep tension → low back pain, weak legs, pelvic instability, collapsed core

This is one of the most common—and most overlooked—roots of dysfunction.

2.3.2 Anterior Tensional Surface — The Dynamic Surface

Corresponds to the Superficial Front Line.

Includes:

  • Pectoralis major/minor

  • Rectus abdominis

  • Hip flexor group

  • Tibialis anterior

  • Foot dorsiflexors

Functions:

  • Flexion and forward movement

  • Step length and forward propulsion

  • Pelvic tilt

  • Coordination among chest, abdomen, hips, and foot

Clinical significance:

  • Excessive tension → kyphosis, chest tightness, forward head posture, hip-flexor low back pain

  • Weak tension → unstable standing, weak running power, abdominal sagging

A major problem in modern sedentary lifestyles.

2.3.3 Posterior Tensional Surface — The Stability Surface

Corresponds to the Superficial Back Line.

Includes:

  • Plantar fascia

  • Gastrocnemius–soleus complex

  • Hamstrings

  • Gluteus maximus

  • Erector spinae

  • Neck extensors

  • Scalp fascia

Functions:

  • Upright posture

  • Spinal curvature integrity

  • Tensile recoil during gait

  • Posterior body stability

Clinical significance:

  • Excessive tension → posterior chain tightness, low back pain, headaches, cervical compression

  • Weak tension → kyphosis, weak low back, fatigue from walking

This is one of the strongest generators of pulling-type pain.

2.3.4 Lateral Tensional Surface — The Balance Surface

Corresponds to the Lateral Line.

Includes:

  • Gluteus medius/minimus

  • Tensor fascia lata

  • Iliotibial band

  • Quadratus lumborum

  • Lateral abdominal muscles

  • Lateral cervical muscles

  • Lateral foot muscles

Functions:

  • Lateral stability

  • Rotation control

  • Gait stabilization

  • Pelvic leveling

  • Shoulder height symmetry

Clinical significance:

  • Excess → pelvic shift, scoliosis, ITB pain, lateral hip pain

  • Weak → poor stair climbing, gait drifting, unstable posture

Nearly all patients with “misalignment” have lateral tensional imbalance.

2.3.5 Integration of the Four Directions: The Tensional Field

These directions are not separate—they combine into a Tensional Field, determining:

  • Posture

  • Gait pattern

  • Spinal curvature

  • Pelvic rotation

  • Shoulder–neck configuration

  • Compensation

  • Pain distribution

  • Emotional tension patterns

  • Autonomic nervous balance

This is the structural bridge from Point → Line → Plane → Spirit in Four-Level Thinking.

2.4 Functions of the Tensional System

The tensional system governs almost all major structural and functional behaviors of the body:

1) Posture

Posture is not created by bones.
Bones are simply “pulled” into position by tension.

Kyphosis
Forward head posture
Shoulder asymmetry
Pelvic tilt
O/X legs

All are tensional patterns, not bone problems.

2) Stability

The body’s stability does not come from joint surfaces “locking,”
but from balanced tension.

When tension distribution fails, all structures drift out of place.

This explains why many “misalignments”
reset themselves when tension changes.

3) Movement Coordination

The tensional system determines:

  • The sequence of muscle activation

  • Synergy among regions

  • How movement chains operate

  • How force transmits through the body

Walking, running, lifting, and sports performance
are all patterns of tensional coordination.

4) Pain and Compensation

Pain is rarely caused by “local damage.”
Most pain originates from uneven tension.

Examples:

  • Tight calf → low back pain

  • Tight scalenes → hand numbness

  • Tight hip flexors → knee pain

  • Tight diaphragm → upper back pain

  • Tight pelvic floor → lumbosacral pain

Compensation is the tensional system’s automatic survival strategy.
When one region cannot hold tension, another region takes over—
causing new pain.

5) Neural Function

The tensional system is tightly coupled with the nervous system:

Excess tension → sympathetic overdrive → poor sleep, fast heartbeat, anxiety
Proper relaxation → parasympathetic activation → better digestion, reduced pain, better recovery

This is the foundational mechanism behind
“why emotions affect the body.”

2.5 The Tensional System Within the Four-Level Framework

Placed back into the Four-Level Thinking model, the tensional system aligns perfectly:

Level One: Point

Local expressions of tension:

  • Fascia nodes

  • Muscle attachment points

  • Bone protrusions

  • Tender points

  • Tight spots

Level Two: Line

Directional expressions of tension:

  • Tensional pathways

  • Pulling directions

  • Force lines from one point to another

We intentionally avoid the word chain to prevent confusion with Level Two “Line.”

Level Three: Plane

System-level patterns:

  • Global posture

  • Compensation patterns

  • Balance and imbalance

  • Upper/lower crossed syndromes

  • Pelvic tilt

  • The entire tensional field

Level Four: Spirit / Field

Tension influenced by higher integrative processes:

  • Emotion → neck/shoulder tension

  • Stress → diaphragm contraction

  • Fear → full-body tightening

  • Sleep → parasympathetic balance → tension decreases or increases

  • Breathing patterns → determine tensional rhythm

The tensional system is the structural bridge connecting
Point → Line → Plane → Spirit.

Chapter Three · The Meridian System: Ancient System Science of the Human Body

(English Translation)

Within the framework of modern medicine, many people think that “meridians” are simply:

  • The twelve primary channels

  • The eight extraordinary vessels

  • A few hundred acupuncture points

  • Some invisible dotted lines drawn on the body

This understanding is far too superficial.

The true Meridian System is an ancient systems model of human life.
It is not a single structure, but an attempt to place:

Structure, function, qi–blood, nerves, emotion, somatic reactions,
internal–external connections, pain patterns, constitution and rhythms

all together on a single functional map of the human body.

In modern terms, it is similar to how we speak about:

  • The nervous system — not a single nerve

  • The immune system — not a single organ

  • The tensional system — not just one fascial chain

In exactly the same way:

The Meridian System is not “a few lines,”
but a multi-layered systems model.

3.1 The Meridian System ≠ Meridian Channels

(The most important idea of this chapter)

Modern readers often confuse “meridian system” with “meridian channels.”
In fact:

Meridian System = Meridians + Jingjin + Divergent Channels + Collaterals + Cutaneous Zones
as an integrated whole.

The meridian system is not a structure,
not an organ,
not a few linear lines.

It is:

An ancient systems model expressed in the language of “lines.”

If we translate it into modern medical terms, we can compare it this way:

System Single structure? Multiple subsystems? Functional whole?
Nervous system No Yes Yes
Immune system No Yes Yes
Tensional system No Yes Yes
Meridian system No Yes Yes

The scientific value of the meridian system does not depend on
whether it can be dissected as one line,
but on whether it can explain the integrated logic of the human body.

And in practice—it does so remarkably well.

3.2 The Five Subsystems of the Meridian System

The ancient physicians abstracted and compressed the body’s structure and function into five main components.
Each plays a specific role, and together they present the full Meridian System.

① Meridians (Jingmai) — Functional Trunk Lines

Including:

  • The twelve primary meridians

  • The eight extraordinary vessels

Characteristics:

  • Directionality

  • Interior–exterior (biao–li) relationships

  • Ascending/descending, entering/exiting

  • Clearly described pathways and patterns of spread

Functions:

  • Describe the directional flow of qi and blood

  • Describe the evolution and spread of disease

  • Describe functional connections between organs and regions

  • Describe the migration and transformation of symptoms

In modern language, meridians are roughly equivalent to:

A mixed “functional pathway” combining neural, vascular, tensional, and metabolic elements.

② Jingjin — The Ancient Language of the Tensional System

Jingjin (muscle–tendon regions) correspond to:

  • Muscle synergy directions

  • Fascial tension

  • Postural control

  • Pathways of referred pain

  • Movement chains

Its core meaning is:

Using Chinese medical language to describe structure and the tensional system.

Common clinical examples:

  • Tight calf → low back pain

  • Tight scalenes → hand numbness

  • Pelvic instability → leg pain

All of these can be interpreted within the framework of Jingjin.

③ Divergent Channels (Jingbie) — Deep System Pathways

Divergent channels connect:

  • Deep visceral organs

  • Deep neural structures

  • The shortest paths between internal organs and the body surface

They explain:

  • How internal disorders manifest externally

  • How emotions transform into somatic symptoms

  • Why stomach disorders can cause back pain

  • Why anxiety can cause chest tightness

In modern terms, they represent an ancient description of:

Deep neuro–visceral integration pathways.

④ Collaterals (Luo Mai) — Networks and Crosspoints

Modern equivalents include:

  • Nerve branches

  • Fascial crosslinks

  • Cutaneous reflex zones

  • Pain-sensitive regions

Collaterals transform “lines” into networks.
They are the key bridge by which the meridian system moves from:

Level Two (Line) → to Level Three (Plane)

⑤ Cutaneous Zones (Pibu) — Autonomic Response Zones on the Surface

Modern equivalents:

  • Autonomic regulation of the skin

  • Changes in skin temperature

  • Altered pain sensitivity

  • Cutaneous signs of sympathetic activation

Many “pibu reactions” are in fact the external manifestations of:

Autonomic nervous system dysregulation.

3.3 The Meridian System as a Cross-Disciplinary, Multi-Level Life Model

When we combine all five subsystems,
the meridian system appears as:

Structure (Jin) + Function (Mai) + Deep Systems (Bie) + Networks (Luo) + Body Surface (Pi)

together forming a life-operation model.

It can simultaneously explain:

  • Structural pain

  • Functional disorders

  • Emotion-related pain

  • Organ–surface interactions

  • Trends and trajectories of disease evolution

  • Constitutional patterns and life rhythms

This is arguably the highest-level language
ancient physicians used to describe the overall operation of the human body.

3.4 The Meridian System Within Four-Level Thinking

Meridians are not a single line.
They span all four levels of the framework:

Level One: Point

Manifestations:

  • Acupuncture points

  • Tender points

  • Jingjin attachment points

  • Cutaneous hypersensitive zones

→ At the Point level, the meridian system appears as local functional points.

Level Two: Line

Manifestations:

  • Meridian pathways

  • Jingjin routes

  • Directions of disease propagation

  • Ascending/descending of qi

→ At the Line level, the meridian system appears as connections and directions.

Level Three: Plane

Manifestations:

  • Overall circulation of qi and blood

  • Yin–yang balance

  • Constitutional patterns

  • Coupling among emotion, sleep, viscera, and body surface

  • Global meridian states (cold, heat, deficiency, excess)

→ At the Plane level, the meridian system appears as systemic integration.

Level Four: Spirit / Field

Manifestations:

  • Emotional states

  • Consciousness

  • Rhythms

  • Life drive and motivation

  • Mind–body integration capacity

→ At the Spirit level, the meridian system expresses the highest integration layer of the life system.

3.5 In One Sentence: The Final Definition of the Meridian System

The meridian system is not “a few lines,”
but a multi-system holistic network described in the ancient language of “lines.”

  • Meridians (Jingmai) are functional trunk lines

  • Jingjin are the structural layer

  • Divergent channels are deep system pathways

  • Collaterals are the network connections

  • Cutaneous zones are the surface responses

Together, they form one of the earliest system-science models of the human body.

📘 Summary of Part One: Medicine Needs a Common Language

With this chapter, your book’s “Foundational Language” section is now complete:

  • Four-Level Thinking — the basic language for understanding the human body

  • The Tensional System — the structural and mechanical foundation from a modern perspective

  • The Meridian System — the functional and integrative foundation from an ancient perspective

Both Chinese medicine and Western medicine
can now be discussed within the same coordinate system.

In the following parts, using this framework, we will systematically compare Chinese and Western medicine in terms of:

  • Their understanding of the human body

  • Diagnostic logic

  • Treatment strategies

  • Rehabilitation and reconstruction

  • Mechanisms of disease development

  • Pain and the nervous system

  • Emotion and sleep

  • The nature of chronic illness

—— Up to this point, your “Part One: Foundational Language” is fully book-ready in both Chinese and English。

Chapter Four · How Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Understand the Human Body under the Four-Tier Thinking Framework

(Faithful English Translation)

To understand the differences between Chinese medicine and Western medicine, we must begin with one fundamental question:

“How does each system view the human body?”

The foundation of medicine is not treatment, but first answering a deeper question:
“What is the human body?”

Different “body models” lead to different diagnostic logics, treatment methods, explanations of disease, and medical systems.

The Four-Tier Thinking framework offers a shared coordinate system so that both medical traditions can be compared on the same map—without confusion or category mistakes.

Below, I will analyze how Chinese and Western medicine understand the body from the four levels: Point, Line, Plane, and Spirit.

1. First Tier: Point — the Foundation of Western Medicine, the Blind Spot of Chinese Medicine

A “point” is a structure, a local unit, something visible, measurable, and tangible.

Western medicine builds its body model from the level of “points”:

  • The body is composed of organs

  • Organs are composed of tissues

  • Tissues are composed of cells

  • Cells are composed of molecules

  • Every structure has a precise location and function

  • Every disease corresponds to a “lesion”

In Western medicine:

The human body is a precise machine made of countless structural points.

This makes Western medicine extremely strong at the “Point” level:

✔ Trauma
✔ Infection
✔ Tears, ruptures
✔ Surgical removal
✔ Structural defects
✔ Lab indicators
✔ Organ failure
✔ Emergency and critical care

As long as the lesion can be “seen,” Western medicine can treat it precisely.

But “points” have inherent limitations. They cannot explain:

✘ Referred pain
✘ Severe pain with completely normal imaging
✘ Emotional stress causing stomach discomfort
✘ Poor sleep causing neck and shoulder tightness
✘ Why a cluster of symptoms appears together
✘ Functional disorders with no structural abnormalities

These are not phenomena that the language of “points” can describe.

Chinese medicine is relatively weak at this tier.
It has the concepts of five zang-organs and six fu-organs, qi, blood, and body fluids,
but lacks detailed anatomical structure.

2. Second Tier: Line — Both Systems Are Strong, But Use Different Languages

A “line” represents relationships between points: direction, transmission, and causal pathways.

In Western medicine:

✔ Neural pathways
✔ Vascular supply lines
✔ Biochemical reaction chains
✔ Force lines (ground → foot → knee → hip → spine)
✔ Temporal progression of disease

Western medicine’s “lines” are precise, but often confined to local systems.

Chinese medicine has a different language for “lines”:

✔ Meridian pathways
✔ Jingjin (myofascial) tension lines
✔ Qi movement—ascending, descending, entering, exiting
✔ Liver qi stagnation → bloating → chest tightness
✔ Spleen deficiency → dampness → joint pain

Chinese medicine observes how lines interact,
not only which “point” is abnormal.

Western medicine excels at anatomical pathways;
Chinese medicine excels at functional pathways.

Different languages, but the same purpose:
to explain why A affects B.

3. Third Tier: Plane — The Domain Where Chinese Medicine Excels and Western Medicine Is Weak

A “plane” is a system, a whole, a network, a field.

The Plane tier deals with:

  • Overall posture (upper/lower crossed syndromes)

  • The meridian network

  • Tensional fields (tightness, looseness, imbalance)

  • Autonomic nervous system

  • Emotion–sleep–metabolism interactions

  • Systemic inflammation

  • Visceral–somatic correlations

  • Whole-body qi-blood patterns

  • Cold–heat, deficiency–excess

  • Constitutional patterns

Chinese medicine has used the language of “planes” from the very beginning:

✔ The whole body is affected
✔ Exterior–interior, cold–heat
✔ Yin and yang shifts
✔ Top–bottom connections
✔ Five-organ interactions
✔ Symptoms appear “in clusters”
✔ Symptoms improve or worsen together

This is naturally a holistic/systemic vocabulary.

Western medicine at this tier remains weak:

✘ Hard to explain “long sitting → pain everywhere”
✘ Hard to explain stomach discomfort → insomnia → palpitations
✘ Hard to explain why low back pain + leg pain occur together
✘ Hard to explain stress → irritable bowel
✘ Hard to explain interactions between posture and visceral function

Western systemic frameworks in immunity, neurology, and metabolism are developing,
but still not mature.

4. Fourth Tier: Spirit — The Core of Chinese Medicine, and a Domain Western Medicine Has Not Yet Named

“Spirit” (Shen) represents the highest level of life integration:

  • How emotions influence the body

  • How bodily sensations influence emotions

  • Why some people repeatedly fall ill at certain life stages

  • Why self-healing ability rises or collapses

  • Why the same disease heals in 3 days for one person and 3 years for another

  • Why trauma (emotional or physical) can freeze the body

  • Why sleep, intention, and rhythm alter metabolism

  • Why the whole person deteriorates or recovers as one

Chinese medicine has a profound understanding of this:

✔ The Heart governs Shen
✔ The Liver governs Qi movement
✔ The Kidneys store willpower
✔ The Spleen governs thought
✔ When Shen is disturbed, disorder appears
✔ When Qi is chaotic, illness arises

These are all languages of life integration.

Western medicine has no complete framework here. It fragments the explanation:

  • Some in “sympathetic/parasympathetic balance”

  • Some in “psycho-neuro-immunology”

  • Some in “brain network activity”

  • Some in “stress physiology”

But there is no unified concept.

This is exactly the purpose of the Four-Tier model:

Spirit is not mysticism; it is the body’s highest integrative function.

5. Four-Tier Thinking Allows the Two Medical Systems to Stand Side-by-Side

One-sentence summary of their positions within the four tiers:

Western medicine is strong in Point → Line (structure → cause);
Chinese medicine is strong in Line → Plane → Spirit (relation → system → life-field).

Thus:

  • Western medicine is precise.

  • Chinese medicine is holistic.

  • Western medicine sees “damaged components.”

  • Chinese medicine sees “patterns of operation.”

  • Western medicine excels in acute, trauma, and critical care.

  • Chinese medicine explains chronicity, pattern, recurrence, and systemic illness.

They are not in competition—
they simply observe from different entry points.

Four-Tier Thinking finally puts them on the same map.

Core sentence of this chapter:
Western medicine enters the body from “Points”; Chinese medicine enters from “Planes.”
The Four-Tier Thinking model is the shared language between them.

Chapter Five · The Rise of “Peripheral Disciplines” in Modern Western Medicine

When all medical systems across the world are placed inside the framework of the Four-Level Thinking Model, one striking pattern becomes clear:

Western medicine begins at Level 1 (Point),
Traditional Chinese Medicine begins at Levels 3–4 (Plane–Spirit),
and modern diseases are forcing both to converge toward the same direction.

This chapter does not discuss culture, ideology, or historical bias.
It analyses a simple structural fact:

Diseases evolve → Medicine must evolve.

1. The Origin of Western Medicine: The Brilliance and Limits of a Level-1 System

Western medicine was born from anatomical revolutions, microscopy, pathology, and experimental science.
It is a classic Level-1 medicine — centered on Point, structure, and lesion.

Level-1 medicine excels in areas where “the problem has a location”:

  • Inflammation → anti-inflammatory drugs

  • Infection → antibiotics

  • Laceration → suturing

  • Fracture → reduction and fixation

  • Organ necrosis → resection

  • Tumor → surgery / radio-chemotherapy

  • Abnormal lab values → pharmaceutical correction

Without Level-1 medicine, human life expectancy and survival from acute disease would not be what they are today.

However—

Level-1 medicine is bound by its level.

It can only deal with what is:

  • visible

  • measurable

  • structural

  • localized

But modern diseases are increasingly:

  • systemic

  • functional

  • referred

  • emotional

  • rhythmic

  • compensatory

  • neuro-tensional

  • field-based

These cannot be described in a “point-based” language.

Thus we see a paradox of modern healthcare:

More tests are normal → More patients feel unwell.

2. When Level-1 Medicine Cannot Explain Modern Illness, Western Medicine Produces “Peripheral Disciplines”

This evolution did not come from cultural integration or philosophical reflection.

It came from clinical reality.

Western doctors see it every day:

  • Normal imaging but disabling pain

  • Stress → immediate gastrointestinal reaction

  • Chronic pain migrating across regions

  • Low sleep → system-wide dysfunction

  • Pelvic tilt → whole-body compensation

  • Emotional trauma → long-term physical “freezing”

These phenomena cannot be understood through points alone.

So naturally, Western medicine generates three major branches that extend upward:

3. Peripheral Disciplines: Western Medicine Ascending to Levels 2–4

(1) Disciplines moving toward Level 2 (Line)

These fields explore relationships between points, i.e., pathways:

  • Sports medicine

  • Chiropractic / spinal manipulation

  • Neuromuscular medicine

  • Neurodynamics

  • Kinetic chains and movement science

These correspond, remarkably, to TCM concepts like:

Jingjin (musculo-tensional pathways) + Meridians (functional pathways).

Key recognitions include:

  • Low back influences the leg

  • Neck influences the hand

  • Ankle affects the knee

  • Pelvis affects spinal alignment

  • Force transmission is global, not local

This is the essence of Level-2 cognition.

(2) Disciplines moving toward Level 3 (Plane)

These fields focus on systems, balance, compensation, and bodywide patterns:

  • Physical therapy

  • Posture medicine

  • Rehabilitation medicine

  • Fascial therapy

  • Biomechanics

  • Core stability systems

Their vocabulary becomes strikingly similar to traditional Chinese concepts:

  • Global compensation

  • Upper–lower linkage

  • Left–right balance

  • Tight here → loose there

  • Posture determines function

  • Tensile field governs pain

This is Western medicine entering the Plane Level (Level-3).

(3) Disciplines moving toward Level 4 (Spirit / Field)

A major shift has emerged:
Western medicine now recognizes that emotion, sleep, stress, trauma, and rhythm are primary drivers of chronic illness.

This has led to the development of:

  • Psychosomatic medicine

  • Autonomic nervous system medicine

  • Vagal nerve modulation

  • Pain neuroscience education (PNE)

  • Trauma-informed therapies

  • Sleep medicine

  • Stress-related medicine

These concepts resonate deeply with TCM insights:

  • Disordered emotions → illness

  • Rhythm disruption → illness

  • Shen disturbance → systemic dysfunction

  • Qi chaos → organ dysfunction

Western medicine is, often unconsciously, stepping into TCM’s Level-4 territory.

**4. Why Is Western Medicine Moving Toward TCM Levels?

Not Imitation — Necessity**

There is one fundamental reason:

Modern diseases are not Level-1 diseases.

And when diseases cross levels,
medicine must follow.

Chronic pain is not a point.
Autonomic dysfunction is not a point.
Emotional-gastric syndromes are not a point.
Compensation chains are not points.
Trauma-induced bodily “freeze” is not a point.

Thus Western medicine is forced into an upward evolution:

Point → Line → Plane → Spirit
(From Level 1 → Multi-Level Medicine)

While TCM has always operated in Levels 3–4.
Therefore, both systems naturally converge.

**5. The Medicine of the Future:

Not Chinese Medicine, Not Western Medicine — but Full-Level Medicine**

Truly advanced medicine must operate across all four levels:

**Level 1: Point — structure, anatomy, lesion, acute care, surgery

Level 2: Line — pathways, force transmission, referral mechanisms
Level 3: Plane — systems, posture, compensation, rhythms, tensional fields
Level 4: Spirit — emotions, sleep, self-regulation, coherence, life integration**

Without Level-1 → no diagnosis, no surgery, no emergency care
Without Level-2 → no explanation of chains, referral, or dynamics
Without Level-3 → no understanding of systemic imbalance
Without Level-4 → no understanding of self-healing and human resilience

Any single-level medicine is incomplete.

When medicine finally spans all four levels:

  • TCM will no longer be misunderstood as mysticism

  • Western medicine will no longer be trapped in local structures

  • All systems can explain each other

  • Most debates will end automatically

Because by then, medicine will have become:

**A complete human medicine —

one that spans all four levels of human reality.**

**Chapter Six · The Modernization of Chinese Medicine:

From a “Third-Tier Medicine” Toward a Breakthrough in the First Tier**

If the previous chapter (Chapter Five) explained how Western medicine is being forced by modern diseases to climb upward (from Point → Line → Plane → Spirit),
then this chapter explains the opposite movement:

How Chinese medicine, under modern clinical demands, is being pushed downward from the 2nd–3rd–4th tiers toward the 1st tier.

This is not a cultural issue, nor a competition between systems.
It is simply the natural evolution of medicine itself.

**1. The Foundation of Chinese Medicine:

Innately a Second-, Third-, and Fourth-Tier Medicine**

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) fundamentally works by:

observing the external → inferring the internal
observing overall patterns → inferring functional states
observing symptom combinations → inferring system status

Which means TCM is strongest in:

Tier 2 – Line (relationships & pathways)

  • Meridian pathways

  • Qi dynamics (“ascending, descending, entering, exiting”)

  • Jingjin (muscle–tension routes)

  • Functional cause–effect chains

Tier 3 – Plane (systems & networks)

  • Qi–blood–yin–yang dynamics

  • Organ–system interactions

  • Body constitution

  • Emotion–sleep–viscera relationships

  • The meridian system as a whole-body network

Tier 4 – Spirit (integration & regulation)

  • Emotion regulation

  • Life rhythm & vitality

  • Self-healing

  • Mind–body integration

This is why TCM excels at:

✔ Functional disorders
✔ Chronic fatigue
✔ Psychosomatic symptoms
✔ Recurrent, systemic, or unexplained syndromes
✔ Meridian-network pain patterns
✔ Autonomic dysfunction
✔ Compensatory pain patterns

In other words:

TCM was born as a “high-tier medicine.”

2. But TCM Is Significantly Weak in Tier One (Structure)

Classical TCM lacked:

✘ Anatomy
✘ Imaging
✘ Microbiology
✘ Immunology
✘ Surgical methods
✘ Structural diagnostics
✘ Tools for acute organ failure
✘ Tools for structural pathology

Therefore, in conditions like:

  • Fractures

  • Suppurative infections

  • Organ failure

  • Tumor compression

  • Acute abdomen

  • Acute nerve compression

  • Myocardial infarction, stroke

  • Rapidly deteriorating organ function

TCM had almost no structural leverage.

Not because TCM is “inferior,” but because:

TCM was created in a pre-anatomical era.
It never had Tier-1 thinking built into its language.

3. Modern Clinical Reality Is Forcing TCM to Break Into Tier One

As modern healthcare matured:

  • Imaging became universal

  • Emergency medicine developed

  • Pathology and microbiology matured

TCM practitioners must now face the question:

“What is the actual structural problem?”

Without Tier-1 judgment, you cannot safely decide whether something is or is not within your scope.

Thus two major trends have emerged:

4. Trend One: TCM Must Develop Tier-1 Diagnostic Literacy

A modern TCM practitioner who cannot distinguish:

Is this a tumor or not?
Is this a fracture or not?
Is this a nerve entrapment or just muscle tension?
Is this a bacterial infection or “heat”?
Is this organ failure or “qi deficiency”?

will inevitably make diagnostic errors.

Therefore modern TCM must learn to interpret:

  • X-ray

  • CT / MRI

  • Laboratory data

  • Signs of organ failure

  • Infection markers

  • Red flags

  • Differential diagnoses

  • Structural causes of pain or dysfunction

This is not “Westernization.”

It is the minimum requirement for safety.

To practice safely, TCM must know:

  • When not to treat

  • When to stop treatment

  • When to refer immediately

  • What is within TCM’s scope—and what is not

**5. Trend Two: The Rise of Tier-1 Treatment Tools Within TCM

The Emergence of Needling-Blades (刃针 / Micro-invasive Acupuncture)**

Techniques such as:

-刃针 (needle-knife)
-微针刀
-针刀
-浮针

have given TCM, for the first time, direct access to structural pathology.

These tools address:

✔ Nerve entrapment
✔ Fibrosis
✔ Adhesions
✔ Tendon stenosis
✔ Fascial thickening
✔ Deep nodules
✔ Tunnel syndromes
✔ Primary tension generators

All of these are Tier-1 structural problems.

In other words:

Needle-knife therapy allows TCM to enter the structural tier for the first time.
A true revolutionary leap.

6. TCM Moving into Tier One ≠ TCM Becoming Western Medicine

Many people misunderstand:

“刃针 = Westernization”

But the real logic is:

(1) TCM must master Tier-1 diagnostics to ensure safety

If you cannot recognize structural danger → you cannot practice safely.

(2) TCM must acquire Tier-1 tools to improve effectiveness

Many chronic pains are not functional—they are structural.
Herbal medicine or qi-regulation alone cannot fix fibrosis or nerve entrapment.

(3) The better TCM understands Western medicine, the more it understands TCM’s true strengths

Not:
“Learn Western medicine → lose TCM.”

But:
“Learn Western medicine → know precisely when TCM works best.”

**7. The Final Direction: Both Systems Will Become

a Single “All-Tier Medicine”**

TCM strengthens Tier One → becomes safer and more complete.
Western medicine strengthens Tier Three and Four → becomes more holistic.

Eventually all medicine will become:

Tier 1 – Structure
Tier 2 – Pathway
Tier 3 – System
Tier 4 – Life-field
ALL integrated.

At that point, there will be no more:

❌ TCM
❌ Western medicine
❌ Alternative medicine
❌ Endless arguments

Only:

One unified, four-tier, complete human medicine.

A medicine that finally sees the whole human being.

**Chapter Seven · In the Four-Tier Framework:

Western Medicine Keeps You Alive,
Chinese Medicine Helps You Live Well**

When we place all diseases into the Four-Tier Thinking framework, one fundamental truth becomes clear:

Tier 1–2 diseases determine whether you survive.
Tier 3–4 diseases determine how well you live.

Western medicine and Chinese medicine each play their roles in different strata of human health.

This chapter is not about praise or criticism.
It is about understanding why different levels of disease require different levels of medicine.

**1. Western Medicine’s Core Mission:

Treat Tier 1 & 2 Diseases — “Keep You Alive”**

Tier 1 (Point) and Tier 2 (Line) diseases share clear characteristics:

  • A specific cause

  • A clear lesion

  • Rapid progression

  • High danger

  • Require immediate intervention

Such as:

  • Acute infections

  • High fever

  • Trauma

  • Organ failure

  • Stroke, myocardial infarction

  • Malignant tumors

  • Sepsis

  • Acute nerve compression

  • Fractures and internal injuries

For these conditions, Western medicine is irreplaceable:

✔ Antibiotics save lives
✔ Surgery restores structure
✔ ICU and dialysis support failing organs
✔ Cancer therapies prolong survival
✔ Emergency medicine stabilizes the critical moment

Without Tier-1 medicine, humans would not live as long as we do today.

But Tier-1 medicine has inherent limitations:

It can only treat what is visible, measurable, and structurally defined.

Yet modern people suffer from conditions that are:

  • Systemic

  • Functional

  • Emotional

  • Stress-related

  • Neurological

  • Postural

  • Tensional

  • Related to lifestyle and rhythm

These are not Point-level problems.

This is why today:

More people feel unwell,
while more tests come back “normal.”

And in Tier 1—
Traditional Chinese Medicine simply has no structural tools.

Not because it is wrong, but because:

TCM was created in an era without anatomy or microscopes.
Tier-1 disorders were outside its conceptual world.

Thus, when life is at risk:

Western medicine is the only correct choice.

**2. Chinese Medicine’s Strength:

Treat Tier 3 & 4 Diseases — “Help You Live Well”**

Tier 3 (Plane) and Tier 4 (Spirit/Field) disorders have opposite characteristics:

  • Not immediately life-threatening

  • Often normal on imaging

  • Mechanistically complex

  • Strongly influenced by system-wide interactions

  • Persistent, recurrent

  • Profoundly impact quality of life

Such as:

  • Chronic fatigue

  • Chronic pain and widespread pain

  • Sleep disorders

  • Autonomic dysfunction

  • Stress-related visceral symptoms

  • Digestive–sleep–emotional loops

  • Recurrent migraine

  • Tension-driven symptoms

  • Postural or tensional syndromes

These conditions won’t kill you,
but they will take away the joy of life.

And here, TCM excels:

✔ Regulating qi and blood
✔ Balancing organ networks
✔ Harmonizing autonomic patterns
✔ Modulating tension fields
✔ Rebuilding physiological rhythm
✔ Improving sleep, digestion, emotions
✔ Enhancing self-healing capacity

Put simply:

Tier-3 and Tier-4 diseases are “life diseases,”
and TCM is a life-medicine.

TCM treats:

  • How you feel

  • How you function

  • How you sleep

  • How you digest

  • How you respond

  • How you enjoy life

TCM is the medicine of living well.

**3. Why TCM Works in Tier 3–4:

Because These Diseases Depend on “Inner Strength”**

Tier-3 and Tier-4 disorders are not caused by external pathogens alone.
They arise from:

  • Autonomic dysregulation

  • Tension imbalances

  • Emotional–somatic coupling

  • Rhythmic disruption

  • Reduced self-repair

  • Qi–blood stagnation

  • Systemic compensation

These are not “foreign invaders.”
They are internal misalignments.

TCM is designed precisely to restore:

  • Internal regulation

  • Rhythmic harmony

  • Emotional–somatic integration

  • Self-healing capability

  • Network balance

This is why:

✔ TCM cannot replace emergency medicine
✔ But it can restore quality of life in a way Western medicine cannot

Western medicine gives you life.
TCM gives you the life you want.

**4. A Key Reality:

Western Medicine Uses External Forces;
TCM Activates Internal Forces**

Western medicine = external intervention

  • Drugs

  • Surgery

  • Medical devices

  • Chemotherapy, radiotherapy

  • Dialysis, ICU

When external tools run out—
when no more drugs work, when no further surgery is possible—
Western medicine reaches its limit.

But this is not failure;
it simply reflects that:

Tier-1 tools cannot solve Tier-3/4 problems.

TCM = internal activation

  • Restores self-healing

  • Regulates autonomic balance

  • Unlocks tension fields

  • Rebuilds circadian rhythms

  • Restores organ–system harmony

  • Strengthens vitality

When internal regulation improves:

  • Pain decreases

  • Sleep improves

  • Anxiety softens

  • Digestion harmonizes

  • Energy returns

  • Life feels lighter and more meaningful

Quality of life depends far more on
internal capacity than external medication.

**5. The Most Rational Division of Labor:

Western Medicine for Survival,
Chinese Medicine for Quality of Life**

A one-sentence summary:

For survival → Western medicine
For living well → Chinese medicine

Acute, dangerous diseases → Western medicine
Chronic, functional, systemic, emotional conditions → TCM

This is the most scientific and balanced way to understand both medicines.

The ultimate direction of medical evolution is:

Tier-1 (Structure)
Tier-2 (Pathways)
Tier-3 (Systems)
Tier-4 (Life-Field)

A complete medicine must operate on all four tiers.

And one day—
when both traditions fully mature—

There will no longer be “Chinese medicine” and “Western medicine.”
Only a fully integrated, four-tier Complete Human Medicine.

Chapter Eight · Reinterpreting Yin–Yang in Modern Language:

From Compensation to the Body’s Automatic Regulation System

If the previous chapters establish the four-level structure of medical thinking (“Point–Line–Plane–Spirit”), this chapter enters the most foundational—and most frequently misunderstood—concept in Chinese medicine: Yin–Yang.

For a long time, Yin–Yang was seen as philosophy or metaphysics. But when we reinterpret it through the lens of modern system regulation and compensation, a clear truth emerges:

Yin–Yang is not abstract philosophy; it is the ancient symbol for the body’s automatic regulation and compensation system.

It is not mystical.
It is more precise and more comprehensive than modern physiology.

I. What Did “Yin–Yang” Actually Describe in Classical Medicine?

The classic text Su Wen, Yin Yang Ying Xiang Da Lun opens:

“Yin and Yang are the governing principles of all things, the parents of transformation, the foundation of life and death, and the dwelling of spirit.”

People memorize this sentence, but few understand its medical meaning.
Interpreted in modern language, each phrase corresponds to a major physiological system:

1. “Governing principles” = system rules of biological regulation

Every organism functions through opposing forces held in dynamic balance:

  • excitation / inhibition

  • tension / relaxation

  • output / recovery

  • activity / restoration

This is exactly the architecture of autonomic, endocrine, and fluid regulation.

2. “Parents of transformation” = drivers of physiological change

Life is continuous adjustment—drifting away and being pulled back.

This is the essence of homeostasis.

3. “Foundation of life and death” = compensation vs. collapse

  • harmonious Yin–Yang → successful compensation → survival

  • strained Yin–Yang → over-compensation → disease

  • Yin–Yang breakdown → compensation failure → crisis

The classics described this centuries before the concept of homeostasis existed.

4. “Dwelling of spirit” = highest integrative regulatory system

Emotion, sleep, awareness, rhythm, resilience—all belong to the “Spirit” level.

Yin–Yang is the framework behind this integration.

II. Yin–Yang Is the Body’s Automatic Compensation System

You often say in clinic:

“Everyone has compensation, we just aren’t aware of it.”

This is the most modern and most accurate definition of Yin–Yang.

1. Yin–Yang = automatic correction and compensation

A small deviation → immediate self-correction
A prolonged deviation → new balance point
A large deviation → systemic compensation
Compensation failure → disease

This includes:

  • autonomic nervous adjustments

  • endocrine negative feedback

  • fluid/blood volume recalibration

  • fascial and muscular compensation chains

  • chronic stress resetting the HPA axis

Ancient physicians lacked these terms.
They used one symbol:

Yin–Yang.

2. Why do early Yin–Yang imbalances not show on tests?

Because early compensation produces very subtle changes:

  • 5–10% increase in muscle tension

  • slight shift in body fluids

  • mild drift in hormone rhythms

  • shallow sympathetic hyper-arousal

  • minor imbalance in fascial tension chains

MRI, CT, ultrasound, blood tests → all normal.
But the body is working hard in the background.

This is:

Hidden compensation = “mild Yin–Yang imbalance.”

3. Symptoms appear only when compensation becomes strained

When compensation “leaks,” symptoms appear:

  • headaches, neck tightness

  • sleep disturbance

  • digestive weakness

  • palpitations

  • widespread pain

  • easy fatigue

  • emotional sensitivity

  • menstrual irregularity

  • cold extremities

These are not sudden diseases.
They are:

Compensation failure → Yin–Yang dysregulation.

Your sentence is the central thesis of this chapter:

“Symptoms appear only when compensation can no longer hold.”

III. Regulating Yin–Yang = Correcting Wrong Compensation

Chinese medicine seems to “tonify Yin,” “support Yang,” “soothe Liver,” “strengthen Spleen,”
but the essence is the same:

Stop the wrong compensation and restore the correct compensation.

Using the four-level framework:

1. Point level (structure)

Acupuncture, needle-knife, fascial release correct:

  • scalene tension

  • psoas spasm

  • piriformis compression

  • peroneal nerve entrapment

  • deep myofascial knots

2. Line level (connection pathways)

Restore tension chains, referral chains, neuro-mechanical pathways.

3. Plane level (system)

Improve sleep, rhythm, autonomic balance, metabolic patterns, posture dynamics.

4. Spirit level (integration)

Reset autonomic tone, endocrine rhythm, stress response, self-regulation capacity.

So in modern language:

Regulating Yin–Yang = restoring the body’s ability to regulate itself.

This is far more scientific and faithful to the original meaning than simplistic “tonifying Yin/Yang.”

IV. Yin–Yang Is Not Mysticism; It Is a Higher-Order Systems Model

Modern medicine divides regulation into:

  • autonomic nervous system

  • endocrine system

  • immune regulation

  • fluid/volume regulation

  • metabolic adjustment

  • psychological stress response

  • fascial tension networks

Ancient physicians integrated all these into one meta-concept:

Yin–Yang.

It is a framework above physiology—
a meta-regulatory architecture, not a philosophical symbol.

Your work is modernizing this architecture and making it clinically operational.

V. Chapter Summary

  • Yin–Yang = the totality of the body’s automatic regulation systems

  • Yin–Yang imbalance = compensation strain or failure

  • Regulating Yin–Yang = correcting wrong compensation

  • Yin–Yang is a higher-order system beyond homeostasis

  • Chinese medicine is ancient systems science, not metaphysics

Signature Quote 

“Yin–Yang is not philosophy; it is the body’s automatic compensation system.
All chronic diseases are, in essence, failures of compensation.”

Chapter Nine · The Four-Level Positioning of Traditional Chinese Medical Diagnosis

— An Overview of a Whole-State Diagnostic System Based on Observation, Listening, Inquiry, and Palpation

To truly understand the diagnostic system of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), one must first let go of a deeply rooted assumption in modern medicine:

Diagnosis must always aim to locate a specific lesion.

From its very beginning, TCM diagnosis was never designed to identify a single structural abnormality. Instead, it seeks to answer a more fundamental and higher-level question:

In what overall state is this person’s life system operating?

Therefore, TCM diagnosis does not primarily ask “Where is the problem?”
It asks instead:

  • Is the body predominantly cold or hot?

  • Is it sustained by deficiency, or fighting through excess?

  • Is the condition superficial or internal?

  • Is the body barely compensating, or does it still have recovery capacity?

  • Are essence, energy, and spirit still functioning in coordination?

From the perspective of Four-Level Thinking, this already makes one thing clear:

TCM diagnosis naturally operates at the third (systemic) and fourth (integrative life-regulation) levels, rather than the first (structural) level.

I. Observation, Listening, Inquiry, and Palpation:

Not Four Techniques, but Four Channels of Whole-State Sampling

The classical TCM framework of Observation (望), Listening/Smelling (闻), Inquiry (问), and Palpation (切) is not a collection of isolated examination techniques.
Rather, it represents four complementary channels for sampling the body’s overall functional state from different dimensions.

1. Observation (Inspection): Seeing the Whole, Not the Detail

Observation is far more than simply looking at the tongue.

It includes assessment of:

  • Facial color and expression

  • Mental clarity and eye vitality

  • Posture, stance, and gait

  • Muscle tone: tension, collapse, rigidity, or softness

  • Breathing depth and rhythm

  • Tongue color, shape, and coating

  • Overall vitality and spirit

All of this information converges toward one central question:

Is the body operating in a state of tension, defense, exhaustion, collapse—or in relative balance, stability, and reserve capacity?

This is classic third-level (systemic) and fourth-level (life-regulatory) information.

2. Listening and Smelling: External Signals of Systemic Metabolism and Autonomic State

Listening and smelling are not mystical practices, nor are they limited to detecting odors.

They reflect observation of:

  • Body odor and breath

  • Exhalation quality

  • Excretory smells

  • External manifestations of metabolic or fluid imbalance

At their core, these observations reflect:

  • Metabolic status

  • Body fluid burden

  • Autonomic nervous system tone

Once again, this belongs squarely to third-level systemic assessment.

3. Inquiry: Asking How the Body Is Operating, Not Naming a Disease

As you have already pointed out, TCM inquiry differs fundamentally from Western medical history-taking.

TCM inquiry focuses on:

  • Sensitivity to cold or heat

  • Sweating patterns

  • Sleep quality

  • Appetite and thirst

  • Urination and bowel movements

  • Fatigue and recovery capacity

  • Emotional and mental state

  • Nature of pain (fixed, migrating, distending, stabbing)

  • Onset, progression, and pattern of symptoms

The key question is not “Where is the disease?”
It is:

How is the body currently functioning as a whole?

This is an assessment of system dynamics and long-term compensation, belonging to the third and fourth levels.

4. Palpation: Pulse Diagnosis as a Window into Systemic Dynamics

Palpation centers on pulse diagnosis, supported by:

  • Local pressure testing

  • Abdominal examination

  • Tactile assessment of cold, heat, tension, or softness

The purpose of pulse diagnosis is not organ localization.
It evaluates:

  • Functional drive and vitality

  • Systemic tension

  • Whether the body is operating in a compensatory mode

  • Whether the system is “holding itself together under strain”

From a Four-Level perspective, palpation provides direct access to the fourth level—the life-regulatory domain.

II. The Final TCM Diagnosis: A Pattern, Not a Lesion

The ultimate diagnostic conclusion in TCM is usually expressed as a pattern (证), such as:

  • Liver Qi stagnation

  • Spleen deficiency with dampness

  • Kidney Yang or Yin deficiency

  • Channel obstruction

  • Qi and Blood deficiency

  • Cold–Heat complexity

These are not structural diagnoses.

They are summative descriptions of the body’s overall operating state.

Within the Four-Level framework:

  • They are not first-level structural findings

  • Not merely second-level pathways

  • But integrated third-level system states and fourth-level regulatory conditions

III. The Four-Level Positioning of TCM Diagnosis

The role of TCM diagnosis can now be clearly defined:

  • TCM diagnosis ≠ lesion localization

  • TCM diagnosis ≠ structural pathology

  • TCM diagnosis = whole-state functional recognition

Four-Level Layer Role of TCM Diagnosis
Level 1 (Point) Minimal involvement
Level 2 (Line) Channels, tendino-muscular pathways, Qi movement
Level 3 (Plane) Primary domain: cold/heat, deficiency/excess, systemic balance
Level 4 (Spirit) Essence, vitality, compensation, recovery potential

This leads to a clear conclusion:

TCM diagnosis is fundamentally a third- and fourth-level diagnostic system.

IV. Chapter Summary: Establishing the Coordinate System for Diagnostic Reconstruction

The purpose of this chapter is not to argue whether TCM diagnosis is “accurate” or not.

Its purpose is to establish a clear coordinate framework for the chapters that follow:

  • Chapter 9: TCM Diagnosis — Whole-State Recognition (Levels 3–4)

  • Chapter 10: Western Medical Diagnosis — Structural and Evidence-Based Systems (Primarily Level 1, extending to Level 2)

From this point onward, the book moves into the Four-Level Reconstruction of Diagnosis.

We will no longer debate “TCM versus Western medicine.”
Instead, we will repeatedly return to one central question:

Which level of the human system does this diagnostic tool actually address?

This question becomes the shared language for all future discussion.

Chapter Ten · The Four-Level Positioning of Western Medical Diagnosis

A First-Level Medical System Centered on Localization and Classification

Modern medicine (commonly referred to as Western medicine) emerged over the past one to two centuries alongside the rapid development of anatomy, experimental science, medical imaging, and evidence-based medicine.

Its core diagnostic objective is remarkably clear:

to identify the lesion, determine its location, and define its nature.

In other words, Western medical diagnosis is not primarily concerned with evaluating the overall state of the body,
but rather with answering a more direct and urgent question:

Where is the disease, what exactly is it, and how dangerous is it?

From the perspective of Four-Level Thinking,
this constitutes a diagnostic system fundamentally centered on Level One (Point).

**I. The Basic Diagnostic Pathway in Western Medicine:

From Subjective Clues to Objective Evidence**

Western medical diagnosis does not occur in a single step.
It is a progressive process that gradually narrows toward the lesion, typically unfolding in two major phases.

1. History Taking: Establishing an Initial Diagnostic Hypothesis

The primary purpose of history taking in Western medicine is to reconstruct the evolution of the disease itself, including:

  • Time of onset and triggering factors

  • Sequence and progression of symptoms

  • Current severity and functional impact

  • Past medical and medication history

  • Family history and genetic background

Through this process, the clinician forms a preliminary differential diagnosis, focusing on a critical question:

Which conditions must be ruled out first?

For example:

  • Chest pain → rule out myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolism

  • Abdominal pain → rule out acute abdomen

  • Headache → rule out intracranial hemorrhage or tumor

This reflects a quintessential first-level medical logic:

preserve life first, refine diagnosis later.

2. Examination: Achieving Localization and Classification

Once an initial hypothesis is formed, the diagnostic process advances toward objective confirmation.
At this stage, the goal is singular:

to establish the lesion using objective evidence.

Examinations can be broadly divided into three categories.

(1) Physical Examination

This involves direct assessment by the clinician using hands and basic instruments, including:

  • Inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation

  • Neurological reflex and sensory testing

  • Muscle strength and joint range of motion

  • Local tenderness, masses, and abnormal signs

This stage still relies on the human examiner as the diagnostic instrument,
seeking discrete abnormal “points” on or within the body.

(2) Instrumental and Laboratory Investigations

This is the most defining strength of modern medicine.

Imaging studies

  • X-ray

  • CT

  • MRI

  • Ultrasound

These enable precise anatomical localization of pathology.

Laboratory tests

  • Blood

  • Urine

  • Stool

  • Biochemical and inflammatory markers

These tests detect whether functional disturbances have already evolved into measurable material changes.

Through these technologies, previously invisible abnormalities become visible, quantifiable, and documentable.

(3) Invasive and Definitive Diagnostic Procedures

When further clarification is required, Western medicine employs direct investigative methods such as:

  • Endoscopy (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, cystoscopy)

  • Needle biopsy and tissue sampling

  • Histopathological examination

  • Molecular biology and genetic testing

These procedures resolve the question:

“What exactly is this disease?”

They form the foundation of definitive (qualitative) diagnosis in Western medicine.

**II. The Core Strength of Western Diagnosis:

Precision at the First Level**

Within the Four-Level framework, Western diagnostic strength is highly concentrated at Level One (Point):

  • Clear visualization of lesions

  • Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant processes

  • Identification of structural damage

  • Risk stratification and prognosis

This makes Western medicine indispensable in:

  • Acute infections

  • Trauma and fractures

  • Tumors

  • Organ failure

  • Acute abdominal and neurological emergencies

It is no exaggeration to state:

First-level medicine is the life-saving foundation of modern healthcare.

**III. The Inherent Boundary of Western Diagnosis:

When Disease Has Not Yet Become a “Point”**

Precisely because Western diagnosis relies so heavily on structure, imaging, and objective markers, it possesses a natural limitation:

When disease has not yet manifested as a definable lesion, diagnostic capability diminishes.

Western medicine often struggles in cases involving:

  • Functional disorders

  • Early systemic imbalance

  • Chronic pain with normal imaging

  • Psychosomatic conditions

  • Autonomic nervous system dysregulation

  • Chronic fatigue and subclinical states

It is important to clarify:

Modern medicine does not deny the existence of these conditions.

Rather, its diagnostic tools are primarily designed for first-level objectives,
and therefore cannot complete a diagnostic loop when no structural change is present.

**IV. Evidence-Based Medicine:

Population-Level Extension of First-Level Diagnosis**

Western diagnostic standards are further grounded in evidence-based medicine.

Through large-scale studies, statistical analysis, and clinical guidelines,
modern medicine establishes standardized diagnostic criteria.

However, such evidence represents population-level averages,
not individualized assessments of whole-body states.

From a Four-Level perspective, this remains an extension of first-level thinking,
rather than a system-level diagnostic framework.

**V. Summary:

The True Position of Western Diagnosis in the Four-Level Model**

In summary:

  • Western diagnosis is centered on Level One (Point)

  • It excels at localization, classification, and risk assessment

  • It is indispensable for acute, structural, and life-threatening conditions

  • Its tools are limited when disease has not yet formed a lesion

This is not a flaw, but a natural consequence of system design.

For this reason, Western and Chinese medical diagnostics are not contradictory,
but rather operate at different observational levels of the human body.

In the next chapter, using the same Four-Level coordinate system,
we will examine how Traditional Chinese Medical diagnostics function primarily at Levels Three and Four,
and how these two diagnostic systems can become complementary rather than competitive.

A Closing Statement (for lectures, books, and reflection)

Western medical diagnosis answers “where the disease is and what it is.”
Chinese medical diagnosis asks “what state the person is in.”
They have never been addressing the same level of the problem.

Chapter Eleven · Common Misconceptions in Western Medical Diagnosis

— When “First-Level Medicine” Is Mistaken for “All of Medicine”

Modern medicine (Western medicine) is one of the greatest achievements in human history.
Through anatomy, imaging, laboratory science, and evidence-based research, it has dramatically improved diagnostic accuracy and human survival.

However, in long-term clinical practice, a clear limitation has gradually emerged:

Many of today’s most common health problems do not fully belong to the diagnostic level where Western medicine is strongest.

This is not a problem of technology, nor of individual physicians.
It is a structural limitation of diagnostic hierarchy.

This chapter does not discuss culture or ideology.
Instead, using the Four-Level Thinking framework, it systematically examines the most common diagnostic misconceptions in modern medicine.

I. Misconception One: Over-mythologizing Advanced Medical Technology

A widespread public belief is:

“As long as medical equipment is advanced enough, every problem can be detected.”

Clinical reality tells a very different story.

In everyday medical practice, approximately 80–85% of patients show normal or near-normal results on imaging and laboratory tests, including those with:

  • Functional disorders

  • Chronic pain

  • Autonomic nervous system imbalance

  • Stress-related somatic symptoms

  • Long-term fatigue and compensation states

These conditions often do not present as visible structural or biochemical abnormalities.

Medical imaging and laboratory tests fundamentally answer only one question:

“Is there a detectable structural or measurable abnormality?”

They do not answer:

“Is the body’s overall functional state already dysfunctional?”

When diagnostic tools are over-mythologized, true clinical understanding is often delayed or lost.

II. Misconception Two: Believing Diagnosis Equals Testing

In high-pressure medical systems, diagnosis is often reduced to:

Complaint → Tests → Reports → Conclusion

Over time, this creates a silent assumption:

“Without tests, diagnosis is impossible.”

Yet classical medical diagnosis has always rested on three pillars:

  1. History taking (onset, progression, context, red flags)

  2. Physical examination (inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation, neurological testing)

  3. Auxiliary tests (imaging, labs, pathology)

When physical examination and clinical reasoning are marginalized, medicine risks becoming:

“Machines screening diseases” rather than physicians understanding patients.”

This is not technological progress—it is diagnostic imbalance.

III. Misconception Three: Treating Test Results as Diagnosis

Another frequent error is assuming:

“Abnormal findings equal diagnostic certainty.”

In reality:

  • Structural abnormalities do not always cause symptoms

  • Normal imaging does not exclude dysfunction

  • Old findings may not explain current complaints

Examples include:

  • Disc protrusions on MRI in asymptomatic individuals

  • Normal shoulder imaging in patients with severe functional pain

  • Incidental findings unrelated to present symptoms

Test results are information—not conclusions.

A true diagnosis must answer:

“Is this finding clinically relevant to the patient’s current condition?”

Without integrative judgment, reports replace reasoning.

IV. Misconception Four: “Normal Results” Means “No Disease”

This is one of the most damaging misconceptions in modern practice.

The simplified logic often becomes:

“All tests are normal → No disease.”

When patients continue to suffer despite normal findings, diagnoses frequently shift toward:

  • Psychological issues

  • Anxiety

  • Somatization

  • “Functional, but unexplored”

The problem is not that psychological factors do not exist.
The problem is that:

First-level diagnostic tools are being used to deny third- and fourth-level problems.

Normal tests do not mean a normal person.

V. Misconception Five: Underestimating the Role of Consultation Time

In many healthcare systems:

  • General consultations last 5–10 minutes

  • Specialist visits are similarly compressed

Such timeframes allow only first-level screening:

  • Rule out emergencies

  • Identify red flags

  • Decide on further testing

But for:

  • Chronic illness

  • Complex pain

  • Multi-system dysfunction

  • Long-term compensation states

Diagnosis cannot exist without time.

Medicine is not machines examining bodies.
It is humans understanding human systems.

VI. Misconception Six: Over-focusing on the “10%” While Ignoring the “85%”

Modern medicine excels in conditions that are:

  • Structurally identifiable

  • Surgically treatable

  • Pharmacologically responsive

  • Measurably reversible

These represent roughly 10–15% of clinical conditions.

The remaining 80–85% involve:

  • Chronic discomfort

  • Functional disorders

  • Compensation-based pain

  • Stress-related systemic imbalance

These conditions:

  • Are difficult to image

  • Hard to quantify

  • Offer less immediate clinical “success”

As a result, they are often under-addressed.

Yet for patients, these conditions determine quality of life.

Chapter Summary: This Is Not a Failure of Western Medicine

These misconceptions do not represent the failure of modern medicine.

They reveal something more important:

First-level medicine has reached its natural boundary.

When tools designed for structural diagnosis are used to explain all layers of human health, misunderstanding is inevitable.

This is not an argument against Western medicine.
It is an argument for placing medicine back into a multi-level framework.

In the next chapter, we will apply the same clarity and honesty to examine: Common diagnostic misconceptions within Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Chapter Twelve · Common Misconceptions in Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis

To truly understand Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM),
one must first clear up a series of deeply rooted misconceptions about what TCM diagnosis actually is.

Many disputes between TCM and Western medicine do not arise from effectiveness or evidence,
but from a fundamental misunderstanding of what level of problem each diagnostic system is designed to address.

Using the Four-Level Thinking framework,
this chapter systematically clarifies the most common misconceptions surrounding TCM diagnosis.

I. Misconception One (Fundamental Misconception)

Treating TCM Diagnosis as a “Disease Diagnosis” in the Modern Medical Sense

This is the most basic and most consequential misunderstanding.

In modern medicine, the word disease almost always refers to a first-level problem:

  • a lung nodule

  • a herniated disc

  • a brain tumor

  • an inflamed organ

  • a structural lesion with a defined location

TCM diagnosis does not operate at this level.

What TCM diagnoses is not a disease entity,
but the functional state of the human body:

  • Qi stagnation

  • Yin or Yang imbalance

  • Excess or deficiency

  • Cold or heat

  • Systemic tension or exhaustion

These are states, not diseases.

Therefore:

TCM diagnosis is not disease diagnosis.
It is functional state assessment.

Confusing these two leads to endless misinterpretation of what TCM can and cannot do.

II. Misconception Two

Treating “Zheng” (Pattern) as a Disease — or Even as a Cause

In TCM, Zheng (证) is often mistranslated or misunderstood.

A Zheng is:

  • not a disease

  • not a lesion

  • not a causal origin

It is a pattern, a cluster of physiological responses, reflecting how the body is currently functioning.

In modern terms, Zheng corresponds most closely to:

  • a syndrome

  • a functional pattern

  • a system-level response

It describes how the body is disordered,
not where the body is damaged,
and certainly not why the disorder originally began.

Treating Zheng as a disease or a root cause is a category error that distorts the entire logic of TCM.

III. Misconception Three

Believing That Pulse Reading Alone Constitutes TCM Diagnosis

Among the public—and even among some practitioners—there is a widespread belief that:

“TCM diagnosis equals pulse diagnosis.”

This is incorrect.

TCM diagnosis is never based on a single input.
It relies on Four Diagnostic Methods used together:

  • Observation (望)

  • Listening and smelling (闻)

  • Inquiry (问)

  • Palpation, including pulse (切)

Pulse diagnosis represents only one component of a broader diagnostic synthesis.

The pulse does not “contain” information about specific organs or diseases.
It reflects:

  • autonomic nervous system tone

  • vascular tension

  • circulatory dynamics

  • overall functional momentum of the body

Pulse reading assesses how the system is running, not what structural lesion exists.

IV. Misconception Four

Believing That Pulse Diagnosis Can Detect Tumors, Stones, or Structural Lesions

A particularly harmful misconception is the belief that pulse reading can identify:

  • lung nodules

  • cancers

  • kidney stones

  • gallstones

  • cerebral infarctions

This belief is not TCM.

Pulse diagnosis is a functional, dynamic signal, not an imaging modality.
It cannot replace:

  • CT

  • MRI

  • ultrasound

  • pathological examination

Claiming otherwise not only misrepresents TCM,
but also exposes patients to serious diagnostic risk.

V. Misconception Five

Believing That TCM Diagnosis Can Replace Modern Medical Examinations

TCM diagnosis and modern medical diagnosis are two fundamentally different observation systems.

They are:

  • complementary

  • not interchangeable

TCM cannot replace:

  • imaging studies

  • laboratory testing

  • invasive diagnostic procedures

Especially in acute, severe, or life-threatening conditions,
modern medical diagnostics are indispensable.

Attempting to substitute one system entirely for the other is dangerous and irresponsible.

VI. Misconception Six

Confusing “Extra-Sensory Abilities” with TCM Diagnosis

Some people associate TCM with so-called special abilities:

  • diagnosing disease by touch alone

  • “seeing” internal organs

  • sensing tumors or blockages without examination

These claims have nothing to do with TCM.

They belong to belief systems, not medical systems.

TCM is a structured, experience-based medical framework,
not a form of mysticism or supernatural perception.

Equating the two undermines both patient safety and the credibility of TCM.

Chapter Summary

At its core, TCM diagnosis is a system-level assessment of bodily state and regulation.

It operates primarily at:

  • the third level (systemic patterns)

  • and the fourth level (overall regulatory capacity)

Mistaking it for first-level disease localization inevitably leads to misunderstanding.

Once the diagnostic level is correctly identified,
TCM and Western medicine no longer contradict each other—
they simply address different layers of the same human system.

Chapter Thirteen · Tongue Diagnosis Through the Lens of Four-Level Thinking

Among all diagnostic tools in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM),
tongue observation is the one most easily understood by modern medicine
and least prone to mystification.

This is because tongue diagnosis is neither symbolic nor metaphorical.
It is a directly observable physiological signal window.

Within the framework of Four-Level Thinking, the role of tongue diagnosis is very clear:

Tongue signs represent a “slow variable” diagnostic tool.
They reflect long-term systemic and material conditions of the body.
Their primary function lies at the Third Level (Plane),
while providing risk clues related to the First Level (Point).

I. Tongue Diagnosis Is Not Disease Naming, but System State Reading

Tongue observation cannot tell you:

  • whether there is a lung nodule

  • whether a tumor exists

  • whether stones are present

  • whether a definite structural lesion is formed

These belong strictly to First-Level (Point) problems,
which require imaging, pathology, and laboratory investigations.

What tongue diagnosis excels at identifying is:

  • whether the body tends toward cold or heat

  • whether microcirculation is smooth or stagnant

  • whether body fluids are sufficient or retained

  • whether chronic inflammatory tendencies exist

  • whether the body is in long-term compensation or depletion

In other words:

Tongue diagnosis does not answer “What disease do you have?”
It answers “What functional and systemic state is your body currently in?”

II. Why Tongue Signs Are a “Slow Variable”

Tongue signs reflect long-term accumulated material and systemic changes, including:

  • body fluid distribution

  • microcirculatory status

  • mucosal metabolism

  • inflammatory tendencies

  • cold–heat bias

  • accumulation of dampness or phlegm

  • constitutional baseline (body type)

These features do not change rapidly with a single emotional fluctuation,
exercise session, or acute pain episode.

Compared with pulse diagnosis, tongue signs therefore demonstrate:

  • greater stability

  • higher reproducibility

  • clearer visual reliability

Tongue signs record what the body has gradually become,
not what it is reacting to at this exact moment.

III. The Tongue as an External Display of Internal System States

The tongue is one of the very few tissues in the human body that simultaneously possesses:

  • rich capillary networks (microcirculation is directly visible)

  • dense neural innervation (autonomic tone can be reflected)

  • rapid mucosal turnover (metabolic changes are recorded quickly)

  • direct connection to the digestive system (spleen–stomach function is revealed)

  • visibility of color, shape, moisture, and coating without instruments

This makes the tongue a natural, open “display screen” of internal system states.

Ancient physicians were not “guessing” from the tongue;
they were reading a biological interface openly provided by the body itself.

IV. Tongue Body: Microcirculation, Body Fluids, and Autonomic Baseline

The tongue body primarily reflects:

  • microcirculatory perfusion

  • body fluid volume and distribution

  • long-term autonomic nervous system tone

Tongue Body Feature Modern System Interpretation
Red Sympathetic dominance / accelerated microcirculation / hypermetabolism
Pale Poor microcirculation / low blood volume / hypometabolism
Dark or purplish Hypoxia, stagnation / tension-field blockage / chronic stress patterns
Enlarged with teeth marks Fluid retention / lymphatic stagnation / low vagal tone
Thin Dehydration / low blood volume / chronic depletion

These are not symbolic abstractions,
but external expressions of long-standing systemic conditions.

V. Tongue Coating: Digestive Function and Metabolic Load

Tongue coating reflects:

  • digestive motility

  • gut microbiome balance

  • mucosal barrier integrity

  • metabolic waste clearance

Tongue Coating Modern Equivalent
White, greasy Weak GI motility / microbiome imbalance / fluid retention
Yellow, greasy Inflammatory tendency / metabolic overload / stress response
No coating Mucosal barrier impairment / reduced digestive function
Thick coating Heavy digestive burden / intra-abdominal pressure dysregulation

From a modern perspective, this corresponds to the integrated status of
gastrointestinal motility, microbiome activity, and mucosal function.

VI. Position of Tongue Diagnosis in Four-Level Thinking

Within the Four-Level Thinking framework, tongue diagnosis is positioned as follows:

  • First Level (Point): not for lesion localization, only for risk indication

  • Second Level (Line): suggests long-term progression and compensation trends

  • Third Level (Plane): core diagnostic domain for systemic pattern recognition

  • Fourth Level (Spirit): indirect reflection only, not the primary tool

Tongue diagnosis is a Third-Level diagnostic tool for assessing the body’s long-term systemic state.

Leave a reply